As part of our commitment to keeping you informed of new regulatory developments and their potential implications, we have highlighted recent statements by federal officials concerning loyalty programs, such as those involving airline miles and credit card points. These comments signal a potential shift in how these programs are viewed under consumer protection laws, and the plaintiffs’ bar is likely to take notice.

Overview of Government Concerns

In a recent NPR interview, Department of Transportation Secretary, Buttigieg expressed concern that loyalty points and miles are not merely perks but are increasingly considered part of consumers’ savings strategies. The key issue highlighted is the unilateral control companies hold over the valuation and terms of these loyalty currencies. Unlike bank deposits, the value and utility of loyalty points or miles can be altered by the issuer without the consumer’s consent. This situation has drawn the attention of the government and we expect the plaintiffs’ bar to follow. A transcript and audio file of the interview can be found here.

Potential Legal and Regulatory Implications

  1. Consumer Protection Laws: The government is keen to ensure that all advertising and transactions related to loyalty programs are “fair, truthful, and transparent.” Any misleading representations about the nature and value of accumulated points or miles could potentially lead to allegations of breach of federal and state consumer protection statutes.
  2. Contractual Changes: The ability of companies to unilaterally change the terms of loyalty programs may be viewed by the plaintiffs’ bar under the lens of unfair contract terms. Legal challenges could arise, particularly if changes are made retrospectively or are not communicated clearly.
  3. Privacy Concerns: Some of the evolving U.S. state privacy laws, including California and Colorado, are already directly addressing how data gathered through loyalty programs is used and shared, a topic that has been an enforcement priority for the California AG, and this trend is likely to continue.
  4. Antitrust Considerations: If the control over these programs leads to anti-competitive practices, it could attract antitrust scrutiny, especially if dominant players in the market use loyalty schemes to disadvantage competitors.

Advisory Recommendations

Given these developments, we recommend the following proactive steps:

  • Review of Program Terms: Ensure that terms and conditions governing loyalty programs are clear, fair and easily accessible to consumers. Consider legal audits to verify compliance with existing consumer protection laws.
  • Transparency in Communications: Enhance transparency around how loyalty points are earned, redeemed and potentially devalued. Clear communication about any changes to these terms is essential to mitigate legal risks.
  • Data Privacy Compliance: Assess and strengthen privacy policies to manage consumer data responsibly and in accordance with applicable privacy laws.
  • Antitrust Compliance: Evaluate the competitive impacts of your loyalty program, particularly if you hold a significant market share.

We are closely monitoring these developments and are ready to assist you in conducting risk assessments and adapting your practices to meet any new regulatory requirements. For a detailed discussion on how these changes might specifically affect your operations, please contact us at your earliest convenience.

*       *      *

This alert is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult with your attorney for advice on specific legal issues.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of David Fioccola David Fioccola

A seasoned litigator and trial lawyer, David Fioccola specializes in the defense of complex commercial disputes and consumer class actions. With more than 20 years of experience, David has tried cases in federal and state courts and before arbitral tribunals throughout the U.S.

A seasoned litigator and trial lawyer, David Fioccola specializes in the defense of complex commercial disputes and consumer class actions. With more than 20 years of experience, David has tried cases in federal and state courts and before arbitral tribunals throughout the U.S. He regularly defends Fortune 500 companies in bet-the-company litigation as well as financial institutions against claims involving federal and state law violations, including antitrust laws, trust claims, and breach of contract.

David has extensive experience handling large-scale internal investigations and represents clients before U.S. federal and state agencies, including the Department of Justice, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and state agencies, such as the New York Department of Financial Services and state attorneys general. Moreover, he has significant experience counseling clients in various U.S. federal laws and statutes, including:

  • The Consumer Financial Protection Act
  • The Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts and Practices (UDAAP)
  • The Federal Antitrust laws
  • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)
  • The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA)
  • The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA)
  • The RICO Act
  • The Truth in Lending Act (TILA)
  • The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
  • California’s Business and Professions Code § 17200

Prior to joining Proskauer, David was the co-chair of the Class Actions and Mass Torts Practice Group at Morrison & Foerster, and the Trial Practice Group.

Photo of Baldassare Vinti Baldassare Vinti

Baldassare (“Baldo”) Vinti is the head of Proskauer’s Intellectual Property Litigation Group.

Baldo is a first-chair trial lawyer known for navigating complex, bet-the-company intellectual property disputes across industry verticals and next-generation technologies. With over 25 years of experience, Baldo represents leading global companies…

Baldassare (“Baldo”) Vinti is the head of Proskauer’s Intellectual Property Litigation Group.

Baldo is a first-chair trial lawyer known for navigating complex, bet-the-company intellectual property disputes across industry verticals and next-generation technologies. With over 25 years of experience, Baldo represents leading global companies and universities in patent, trade secret, false advertising, consumer class actions and technology-related breach of contract litigation in federal and state courts as well as before the International Trade Commission.

Baldo is particularly sought after for his courtroom skill and strategic depth, having led trials, arbitrations and appeals in high-stakes disputes involving technologies ranging from pharmaceuticals and medical devices to encryption, digital media, diagnostics, mobile platforms and software. Baldo has represented global corporations, including Arkema S.A., British Telecommunications PLC, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., Henry Schein, Inc., Maidenform Brands Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corp., Ossur North America Inc., Panasonic Corp., Sony Corp., Welch Foods, Inc. and Zenith Electronics LLC.

With a background in pharmacy, Baldo brings deep domain expertise to pharmaceutical litigation. He has a proven record of driving successful outcomes in complex pharmaceutical milestone payment, royalty and licensing disputes—often stemming from collaboration agreements, co-development deals, and M&A transactions—where the financial and strategic stakes run high.

In addition to representing corporate clients, Baldo works closely with university innovation and technology transfer offices to maximize the financial return of research investments. He develops tailored IP asset optimization strategies and aggressively enforces intellectual property rights to protect and monetize core innovations—whether through high-value licensing agreements, shaping and advancing spin-out company development, or successful litigation.

Baldo also provides strategic counsel on IP due diligence, complex licensing, IP structuring, patentability and freedom-to-operate analyses, and infringement and validity opinions. He advises boards and executive teams on aligning IP strategy with business objectives, mitigating risk and maximizing the value of innovation assets.

A frequent author and commentator on intellectual property topics, Baldo has been quoted in the National Law Journal, Bloomberg BNA, Law360, Westlaw Journal and Inside Counsel magazine. He is also a regular contributor to articles published in Medical Product Outsourcing magazine that deal with the medical device industry.

Baldo served as a judicial intern for Hon. John E. Sprizzo of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and for Hon. Charles A. LaTorella of the New York Supreme Court.