On April 7, 2011, the SEC announced that it had imposed fines of $20,000 each against the former president of a broker-dealer and a former broker for their actions in transferring customer information to a new firm as the defunct firm wound down. The SEC also fined the brokerage firm’s former chief compliance officer $15,000 for compliance failures and security breaches that took place at the defunct firm, some dating back to 2005. Visit our blog to learn more.
Bay State “Brings It”: Attorney General Enters Consent Agreement with Restaurant Group for Data Security Failures
On March 28, 2011, the Massachusetts Superior Court issued a Final Judgment by Consent between the Commonwealth and Briar Group, LLC that resolves allegations that Briar Group failed to take measures to protect consumer credit and debit card information. Pursuant to the Final Judgment, Briar Group must pay $110,000 to the Commonwealth, establish a written information security program (“WISP”), and implement a number of other information security measures to help protect customer data.
…
Justice Roberts: “This Isn’t Personal, and Neither Are Your Corporate Records”
In a unanimous decision on March 1, 2011, the Supreme Court held in FCC v. AT&T that corporations do not have personal privacy rights under the Freedom of Information Act, reversing a 2009 Third Circuit decision.
…
Credit Report Resellers Settle FTC Charges Over Poor Security
The Federal Trade Commission recently announced that it reached a settlement with three consumer credit report resellers whose information security practices and procedures were not sufficient to prevent hackers to obtain more than 1,800 consumer credit reports without authorization. The settlement resolves allegations that the resellers violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the FTC Act and the Gramm Leach Bliley Safeguards Rule by failing to take appropriate precautions to protect credit reports and the personal information such reports contain. According to the FTC, the resellers’ information security deficiencies included (1) not having comprehensive information security policies or procedures in place; (2) releasing consumer reports to clients who lacked basic security measures, such as firewalls and updated antivirus software; (3) failing to protect their own internet portals and thereby furnishing credit reports to hackers who lacked a permissible purpose for having them; and (4) not making reasonable efforts to protect against future breaches even after becoming aware of the hackers’ illegitimate activities.
Cignet Proves That It Is Bad To Violate The HIPPA Privacy Rule, But Worse To Ignore HHS
Cignet Health was fined $4.3 million by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Civil Rights for violating the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
…
90210 Gets Personal: California Supreme Court Rules that ZIP Codes are “Personal Identification Information”
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court held that ZIP codes are “personal identification information” within the meaning of the state’s Song Beverly Credit Card Act. The court’s decision in Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., No. S178241 slip op. (Cal. Feb. 10, 2011), casts a dark cloud over the established retail practice of asking for ZIP codes when customers make brick-and-mortar purchases using a credit card and essentially reverses the Court of Appeal’s decision in Party City Corp. v. Superior Court, 169 Cal. App. 4th 497 (2008). In addition to some heated debate, the Pineda decision is likely to generate a healthy number of lawsuits against California retailers.
…
International Cellular Network Industry Association Releases Privacy Principles
Hot on the trail of the FTC’s recent report on privacy, the GSMA, the London-based industry association representing over 800 cellular network operators worldwide, released its “high-level” Mobile Privacy Principles (the “Principles”) on January 27, 2011.
…