No job? Bad credit? No problem! (In Illinois.)

Illinois recently enacted legislation that broadly restricts a private employer from using credit reports regarding job applicants or current employees. Subject to certain exceptions, an employer may not inquire about, order, or obtain a job applicant’s credit report, or fail or refuse to hire or recruit an individual based on the individual’s credit report or history. With respect to current employees, an employer may not discharge or otherwise discriminate against an employee because of the employee’s credit history or credit report. The law also prevents an employer from requiring an applicant or employee to waive any rights under the new law and prohibits retaliatory and discriminatory acts by the employer. Importantly, the law creates a private right of action for an individual to seek injunctive relief and damages and provides for prevailing-party attorneys’ fees.

The newly-enacted law becomes effective January 1, 2011. Notably, there are a number of exceptions. For example, banks, credit unions, insurance companies, debt collectors, and a variety of other finance-related entities are exempted from the rule.  Law enforcement officers and other state or local government agencies are also exempted. The law also does not apply in a variety of other situations—when:

  • State or federal law requires bonding or other security covering an individual holding the position.
  • The duties of the position include custody of or unsupervised access to cash or marketable assets valued at $2,500 or more.
  • The duties of the position include signatory power over business assets of $100 or more per transaction.
  • The position is a managerial position which involves setting the direction or control of the business.
  • The position involves access to personal or confidential information, financial information, trade secrets, or State or national security information.
  • The position meets criteria in administrative rules, if any, that the U.S. Department of Labor or the Illinois Department of Labor has promulgated to establish the circumstances in which a credit history is a bona fide occupational requirement.
  • The employee’s or applicant’s credit history is otherwise required by or exempt under federal or State law.

The new Illinois law appears to be aimed at protecting individuals whose credit scores have suffered as a result of the financial downturn. The new law would protect an individual who, for example, lost his or her job and was unable to pay some of his or her bills during the period of unemployment. Although an employer could currently request access to the job applicant’s credit report, see the delinquent accounts, and refuse to hire the individual based on this information, as of January 1, 2011, the employer would be prohibited from even requesting the individual’s credit report—unless one of the many statutory exceptions applies. The legislature’s creation of a private right of action and attorneys’ fees provisions signifies the importance of an employer’s compliance with this new law.

Northern Disclosure: Alaska Enacts 44th State Breach Notification Law

Alaska passed a breach notification law in June, making it state number 44 to do so.  As most are aware by now, Alaska's new law, Alaska Stat. § 45.48.010 et seq., includes breach notification requirements, restrictions on use of Social Security numbers, and allows consumers to place a security [deep] freeze on their credit reports.  Notification of a breach is not required if, after an appropriate investigation and written notification to Alaska’s attorney general, the covered entity determines that there is not a reasonable likelihood that harm to consumers has resulted or will result from the breach.  By popular demand, following is our updated list of security breach notification laws.

Alaska (ALASKA STAT. § 45.48.010 et seq.)

Arizona (ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 44-7501(h))

Arkansas (ARK. CODE ANN. § 4-110-101 et seq.)

California (CAL. CIV. CODE § 1798.82)

Colorado (COLO. REV. STAT. § 6-1-716)

Connecticut (CONN. GEN. STAT. § 36a-701b)

Delaware (DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 6, § 12B-101)

District of Columbia (District of Columbia B16-810, D.C. Code § 28-3851)

Florida (FLA. STAT. § 817.5681)

Georgia (GA. CODE ANN. § 10-1-911)

Hawaii (Hawaii Revised Stat. §§ 487N-1 et seq.)

Idaho (IDAHO CODE ANN. § 28-51-104 et seq.)

Illinois (815 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 530/5, /10)

Indiana (IND. CODE § 24-4.9)

Iowa (SF 2308)

Kansas (KAN. STAT. ANN. §§ 50-7a01-02)

Louisiana (LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 51:3071 et seq.)

Maine (ME. REV. STAT. ANN. tit. 10, §1346 et seq.)

Maryland (H.B. 208 and S.B. 194)

Massachusetts (Massachusetts General Laws Ann. 93H §§ 1 et seq.)

Michigan (Michigan Compiled Laws Ann. 445.72)

Minnesota (MINN. STAT. § 325E.61)

Montana (MONT. CODE ANN. § 30-14-1704)

Nebraska (NEB. REV. STAT. § 87-801 et seq.)

Nevada (NEV. REV. STAT. 603A.010 et seq.)

New Hampshire (N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. § 359-C:19 et seq.)

New Jersey (N.J. STAT. ANN. § 56:8-163)

New York (N.Y. GEN. BUS. LAW § 899-aa)

North Carolina (N.C. GEN. STAT.§ 75-60 et seq.)

North Dakota (N.D. CENT. CODE § 51-30-01 et seq.)

Ohio (OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 1349.19)

Oklahoma (Okla. Stat. § 74-3113.1)

Oregon (S.B. 583)

Pennsylvania (73 PA. CONS. STAT. ANN. § 2303)

Puerto Rico (Law 111 and Regulation 7207)

Rhode Island (R.I. GEN. LAWS § 11-49.2-3)

South Carolina S.B. 453

Tennessee (TENN. CODE ANN. § 47-18-21)

Texas (TEX. BUS. & COMM. CODE ANN. § 521.001 et seq.)

Utah (UTAH CODE ANN. § 13-44-101 et seq.)

Vermont (VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 9, § 2430 et seq.)

Virginia S.B. 307

Washington (WASH. REV. CODE § 19.255.010)

West Virginia S.B. 340

Wisconsin (WIS. STAT. § 134.98)

Wyoming (W.S. 40-12-501 through 40-12-509)