Andrew Hoffman

Andrew Hoffman has no picture

Andrew L. Hoffman is an Associate in the Litigation & Dispute Resolution Department, resident in the Boca Raton office. Andrew has worked on matters involving a broad range of practice areas, including fiduciary litigation, commercial litigation, and privacy and data security law.Prior to joining Proskauer, Andrew served as an interim law clerk to Judge Mark E. Polen of the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal. While in law school, Andrew competed and won best brief awards in three appellate advocacy competitions as a member of his school’s Moot Court Board. He served as a research assistant to Professor and Dean Emeritus Jon L. Mills, who wrote on matters of privacy law and policy. After his first year of law school, Andrew served as a judicial intern to U.S. District Judge Steven D. Merryday of the Middle District of Florida. Additionally, he was selected to serve as a teaching assistant for the first-year legal writing and appellate advocacy courses.Andrew is certified as an information privacy professional (CIPP) by the International Association of Privacy Professionals. He blogs on Proskauer’s Privacy Law Blog, and he assisted in writing and editing two of the firm’s treatises, Proskauer on Privacy and A Practical Guide to the Red Flag Rules.


Articles By This Author

No job? Bad credit? No problem! (In Illinois.)

Illinois recently enacted legislation that broadly restricts a private employer from using credit reports regarding job applicants or current employees. Subject to certain exceptions, an employer may not inquire about, order, or obtain a job applicant’s credit report, or fail or refuse to hire or recruit an individual based on the individual’s credit report or history. With respect to current employees, an employer may not discharge or otherwise discriminate against an employee because of the employee’s credit history or credit report. The law also prevents an employer from requiring an applicant or employee to waive any rights under the new law and prohibits retaliatory and discriminatory acts by the employer. Importantly, the law creates a private right of action for an individual to seek injunctive relief and damages and provides for prevailing-party attorneys’ fees.

Continue Reading...

Twitter's Settlement With the FTC Demonstrates that "Reasonable Security" Isn't Only About Online Commerce

The social networking and micro-blogging service Twitter recently agreed to settle charges with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding its privacy and data security practices. Similar to settlement terms reached with other online merchants, the settlement bars Twitter from misleading consumers about the extent to which it protects the security, privacy, and confidentiality of nonpublic consumer information. Notably, the agreement also requires Twitter to maintain a comprehensive information security program and submit to audits of the program for 10 years. The settlement agreement does not include a monetary penalty. The FTC alleged that despite Twitter’s promises on its website to protect the personal information of its users, Twitter’s practices failed to provide reasonable and appropriate security.  Unlike many of the other companies that the FTC has pursued regarding online security practices, Twitter does not sell goods online or collect financial information from its users.

Continue Reading...

FTC Extends (Yet Again) Enforcement Deadline for Identity Theft Red Flags Rule

The Federal Trade Commission announced today that it is once again extending the deadline for enforcing its “Red Flags” Rule, while Congress considers legislation that would affect the scope of entities covered by the Rule. The FTC is delaying enforcement of the Rule until December 31, 2010 in response to a request from members of Congress who are working to finalize legislation that would limit the scope of business covered by the Rule.

Continue Reading...

It's Not Too Late to Come to the Party: Mississippi Joins 45 Other States by Enacting a Security Breach Notification Law

On April 7, 2010, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour signed H.B. 583, making his state the forty-sixth state with a security breach notification law on the books.

 

Continue Reading...

Florida Supreme Court Holds CGL Policy Covers an "Advertising Injury" Based Upon a TCPA Violation

            The Florida Supreme Court recently held that a commercial general liability (“CGL”) insurance policy that provides coverage for an “advertising injury” covers a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). Penzer v. Transp.  Ins. Co., No. SC08-2068, 2010 WL 308043 (Fla. Jan. 28, 2010). The definition of “advertising injury” in the CGL policy at issue provided coverage for an “injury arising out of” the “[o]ral or written publication of material that violates a person’s right of privacy.” Id. at *4. The policy at issue had no relevant exclusions. Id. at *5-6.

Continue Reading...

District Court Rules TCPA Applies to Text Messages Even Though Recipient Not Charged to Receive the Message

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently ruled that a plaintiff may maintain a suit for receiving an unsolicited Short Message Service (“SMS”) text message under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991, even though the plaintiff was not actually charged for receiving the message. In Abbas v. Selling Source, LLC, No. 09-CV-3413 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 14, 2009), Judge Joan B. Gottschall noted that in enacting the TCPA, “Congress was just as concerned with consumers’ privacy rights and the nuisances of telemarketing” as it was with cost-shifting of communications addressed by the TCPA. Judge Gottschall continued to state that “[a]utomated calls invade privacy and pose nuisances regardless of whether the called party is charged for the call, and so congressional intent is furthered by the TCPA’s application to both charged and uncharged calls.”

Continue Reading...

Older Entries